An Analysis of the Stories 'Be Like Imam Reza (A.S.)' “Mesl-e- Imam Reza Bash” Based on Lipman's Multi-Dimensional Thinking Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 associate professor of Persian of Language and Literature, Persian literature group, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran(Corresponding author),

2 PhD in Persian Language and Literature, Persian literature group, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract
Mathew Lipman proposed the Applied Philosophy for Children program as an educational program in the early 1970s, and with his effort and thought, it gradually evolved, as the acceptance of children and teachers as its audience, caused the expansion of this program in the American society and Other European, African and Asian societies. Cultivating the power of thinking and reasoning in children is Lipman’s goal of the Fabak program to provide the ground for the cultivation of thoughtful, knowledgeable, goal-oriented, questioning and creative people. Stories are the tools of the Fabak program, which are written using the methods of this program to guide children and teenagers to the digging loop. Multidimensional thinking includes creative, caring, critical and collaborative thinking that Lipman and his colleagues have explained and defined to develop a questioning and challenging mind in the audience (children and teenagers). Narratives taken from the lives of religious ascetics have a valuable yield for localizing the types of thinking, the fields of concepts and philosophical and mental questions; Therefore, religious and religious narratives based on fantasy elements (wonderful and wonderful), selected characters and precious models can be a good standard in the implementation of the philosophy program for children. The current research has investigated the types of thinking in the collection of anecdotes “Be Like Imam Reza (AS)” by Hossein Mirzaei based on Lipman’s multidimensional thinking with a descriptive- analytical approach. The results of the research indicate that these anecdotes are a strong stimulus for philosophical exploration and have the necessary capacity to explain philosophical and mental concepts and questions, such as the exchange of ideas and intellectual and reasoning skills or critical and creative thinking are among the most important and prominent types of thinking in the group. The stories are “Be like Imam Reza (AS)”.
 

Keywords


Akbari, Ahmad and others (2012). «Philosophical topics in the stories of Persian literary texts». Thought and child magazine. No 2. 1-17. (in Persian)
AlBarzi, Mahbobeh (2007), Explaining the mediation of motivational beliefs in children›s creativity model with an approach to family, school variables and document beliefs in primary school students, PhD thesis, supervisors Mohammad Khair and Mohammad Muzesi, Shiraz University. (in Persian)
Alizadeh, Puran (2021). «Content analysis of stories of age group «D» in order to adapt to the skills and components of Lipman›s philosophical thinking». Quarterly Journal of Literary Studies and Research of Kharazmi University. Year 12. No 3. 119-145. (in Persian)
Azmatmadar Fard, Fatemeh and others. (2018). «Investigation of the capacity of three stories from Obeid Zakani›s heart-warming treatise based on the components of Lippmann›s philosophical thinking», Shiraz Children›s Literature Studies. ninth year No. 2. 102-121. (in Persian)
Clems, Harris and Reynolds Bean (1986), Teaching Children Responsibility, translated by Parvin Alipour, Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi. (in Persian)
Fisher, Robert (2013). Education and thinking. Translated by Forough Kianzadeh. Ahvaz: Rasesh. (in Persian)
Fisher, Robert and colleagues (2008), Blooming of creativity, translated by Natalie Chuineh, Tehran: Pik Bahar. (in Persian)
Hosseini, Malik and Hosseini, Seyed Hassan (2011). «Ethics of Critical Thinking». Journal of Philosophical Researches of Tabriz University. No. 8. 1-13. (in Persian)
Irvani, Shahin and Mokhtari, Khadijah (2011). «The place of philosophical concepts in Iranian children›s fiction». Children›s literature studies, second year. No 3. 1-32. (in Persian)
Jahani, Jafar (2003). An introduction to research methods in critical thinking. Shiraz: Molek Suleiman. (in Persian)
Kennedy, David et al. (2009). Little philosophers. Translated by Yahya Qaidi. First edition. Tehran: Aiezh. (in Persian)
Kraft, Anna (2009), Fostering creativity in childhood, translated by Mehdi Noorani, Tehran: Rasesh. (in Persian)
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. (in english)
Majid Habibi Iraqi, Leila (2017). A story to explore. First edition, Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. (in Persian)
Maktabifard, Leila (2009). «Course of evolution and formation of critical thinking skills in Iranian authored stories for children and teenagers». Thinking and the child. first year No 1. pp. 100-124. (in Persian)
Mirzaei, Hossein (2018), be like Imam Reza, two volumes, Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi. (in Persian)
Naji, Saeed (2020). Fabek criteria for the story. Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. (in Persian)
SafaiMoghadam, Massoud (1998). «Reviewing the analysis of the slowness movement and what it has for the movement of philosophy for children». Alzahra University Humanities Quarterly. eighth year No. 69. 59-89. (in Persian)
Saif, Ali Akbar (2008). Modern educational psychology: psychology of learning and education. 6th edition, 3rd edition (repeated edition, 42nd edition). Tehran: Duran. (in Persian)
Sharp, A. M) . 2007(, «The Other Side of Reason: the World of the Emotions». in: Sources of Philosophy for Children. Oulu University Press. Studies, 22(1), pp. 137-153. (in english)
Sohrabi, Razieh et al. (2013). «Comparison of Iranian legends, Iranian visual fiction books and foreign visual fiction books based on the components of philosophical thinking». Shiraz children›s literature studies. fourth year No. 1. 91-112. (in Persian)
SultanalQaraei, Khalil and Suleimanjad, Akbar (2008). «Critical thinking and the necessity of teaching it in the classroom». Islamic Education Quarterly. No. 3. 181-195. (in Persian)
Swann, Jennie (2013), Dialogic inquiry: From theory to practice, For the award of Doctor of Philosophy, Univrrcity OF Southern Queensland. (in english)
Tran, N. (2013). Thinking Skills Frameworks to Evaluate Philosophical Modules in Higher Education, Arecls, 2(10), 177-195. (in english)
Yari Dehno, Murad (2015). An introduction to the philosophy program for children. First edition. Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. (in Persian)