Imam Reza (A.S) International Foundation for Culture and Arts Journal of Razavi Culture 2345-2560 6 21 2018 05 22 Pathology of Debate Based on Imam Reza(A.S)'s Debates Pathology of Debate Based on Imam Reza(A.S)'s Debates 173 198 69350 FA Omid Ebrahimi Ph.D student of educational psychology, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran. Delaram Mohammadi Ph.D student of educational psychology, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran. Journal Article 2018 09 18 The debate is a dialogue for common understanding and is one of the ffecivemthods­ to explain and educate celestial teachings. It was used by Prophets and Imams(PBUH) while facing with controversial opinions. Because of the political-cultural situation and dictation ov votes happened at the time of Imam Reza, he performed debates with scientists and elders of several sects to prevent distortion of Islam. He avoided the damages of debate and continued dialogue to clarify the facts, a method that approached considerable results. The aim of this study was the damage assessment of debate based onImam Reza^,s debate schemes. The research has identified the damages of debate based on Imam Reza^,s debates using descriptive – analytical methods and extensive literature review. The results showedthe debate damages would be divided to two major types: the scientific damages (e.g. fallacy in the argument, relying on the non-shared principles, lacking of order and structure in argument, etc) and moral damages (e.g. violation of fairness, prejudice and emulate, personality assessments, etc).The results demonstrated he continued his debates using the rules and avoiding the damages, tried to guide and enlighten the audience and always won all of debates. The debate is a dialogue for common understanding and is one of the ffecivemthods­ to explain and educate celestial teachings. It was used by Prophets and Imams(PBUH) while facing with controversial opinions. Because of the political-cultural situation and dictation ov votes happened at the time of Imam Reza, he performed debates with scientists and elders of several sects to prevent distortion of Islam. He avoided the damages of debate and continued dialogue to clarify the facts, a method that approached considerable results. The aim of this study was the damage assessment of debate based onImam Reza^,s debate schemes. The research has identified the damages of debate based on Imam Reza^,s debates using descriptive – analytical methods and extensive literature review. The results showedthe debate damages would be divided to two major types: the scientific damages (e.g. fallacy in the argument, relying on the non-shared principles, lacking of order and structure in argument, etc) and moral damages (e.g. violation of fairness, prejudice and emulate, personality assessments, etc).The results demonstrated he continued his debates using the rules and avoiding the damages, tried to guide and enlighten the audience and always won all of debates. http://www.farhangerazavi.ir/article_69350_417e4c757fe6109dc77f3867df9eddea.pdf