Author = حیدری نسب، علیرضا
Number of Articles: 3
Investigating the Companionship and Hadith-based Communications of Some Sistani Elites with Imam Reza (A.S) and their Affection Towards the Imam

Investigating the Companionship and Hadith-based Communications of Some Sistani Elites with Imam Reza (A.S) and their Affection Towards the Imam

Volume 12, Issue 47, Summer 2024, Pages 125-148

https://doi.org/10.22034/farzv.2024.400075.1879

Alireza Heydarynasab

Abstract According to the unanimous hadith of SAQALAIN, Muslims pay special attention to ETRAT In the meantime, Sistani who are famous for possessing some human qualities such as belief in God, chivalry and partiality to ETRAT(a.s.) have had significant interest and connections with Imam Reza(a.s.). Investigation and analysis of the reports related to that Imam(a.s.) show that at least three people from Sistani or Sistani descent - Abu Khaled Sejestani, Muhammad bin Faraj Rokhaji and Mokhawwal Sejestani - were among the companions of Imam Reza(a.s.). Interest in Imam Reza(a.s.) in later periods has also been manifested in the behavior and speech of some Sistani elites such as Ibn Abi Dawud Sejestani, Ibn Hebban Bosti and Sana’i Ghaznavi. Ibn Abi Dawud and Ibn Hebban Bosti, who thought and acted in the religious context of Sunnah, had a narrative relationship with Imam Reza(a.s.). In the meantime, if Ibn Hebban has made any notable statements about that Imam(a.s.); In other places, he has compensated for his insolence by mentioning his frequent experience of visiting Imam Reza(a.s.) and his narrative need after visiting. The famous mystic and poet, Sana’i Ghaznavi, has also mentioned the religious position of ETRAT, especially Imam Reza(a.s.), in a long ode while using verses and HADITHS.

Validation of Imam Riḍā (as) Narration in the Interpretation of Verse 44 of Surah Aʿrāf
(A Critique of Ālūsis Point of View)

Validation of Imam Riḍā (as) Narration in the Interpretation of Verse 44 of Surah Aʿrāf (A Critique of Ālūsi's Point of View)

Volume 9, Issue 36, Autumn 2021, Pages 129-153

https://doi.org/10.22034/farzv.2021.259681.1589

Alireza Heydary Nasab, Hosain Khakpour, Fariba Chamani

Abstract Narrations are the second pillar of Islamic knowledge and are equal in validity to the Qur'an. Nevertheless, some features, especially for interpretive narrations such as the weakness of the narrators, have cast doubt on the authenticity of some of them. One of these narrations is a narration from Imam Riḍā (as) that the meaning of "muʾazzin" in verse 44 of Surah A'raf is Imam Ali (as). Ālūsi, who has quoted a number of narrations from Imam Riḍā (as) in his commentary, has considered this theological narration as unacceptable through the Sunnis and consequently incorrect. Review and analysis of related reports shows, despite the fact that there is reason to doubt the authenticity of some methods of this hadith, the superior methods of quoting it in Shiite sources such as Qomi and Kulayni methods have been described as correct, it can be evidence to correct its citation in Sunni sources such as the methods of Hākim Ḥaskāni. Therefore, the entry of this Razavi narration in different ways in the sources of the two sects, along with its existence of various semantic evidences, such as the exclusive role of man in the resurrection, the special position of Ahl al-Bayt (as) in Sharia, especially the personality, history and behavior of Imam Ali (as) Sufficient evidence to prove the authenticity and general accuracy of the hadith. The findings also show that Alusi's denial is rooted in his religious prejudices rather than as a result of the research.

Review of Narrators and Text of the Hadith Al-Īmān Ma’rifatun bil‌Qalb (Faith is the Knowledge of the Heart) and the Instability of Ibn Ḥibbāns Approach

Review of Narrators and Text of the Hadith Al-Īmān Ma’rifatun bil‌Qalb (Faith is the Knowledge of the Heart) and the Instability of Ibn Ḥibbān's Approach

Volume 8, Issue 30, Summer 2020, Pages 9-32

https://doi.org/10.22034/farzv.2020.113307

Alireza Heydari Nasab, Mehdi Bayat Mokhtari

Abstract Some of the hadiths of Imam Riḍā (as), despite being sublime, have been the subject of disagreement between Sunni narrators. Among these hadiths is the hadith "Faith is the knowledge of the heart and the determination of the tongue and the action of body" which has been quoted and accepted by Ibn Abī Dāwūd Sejistānī, but Ibn Ḥibbān Bustī has considered it baseless. Evaluation of the mentioned hadith narrators and the achievement of its message is the subject of this article. The achievement of the researchers of this research indicates that although this hadith lacks the narrators’ authenticity, but it has the authenticity of its issuance and content; because its text is at the peak of accuracy and at a consistent spiritual level due to having similar types of hadiths and evidence. This hadith explains the three pillars of faith that guarantee a good-pure life and challenges the belief of the Murjiah who consider the practice of religious duties outside the truth of faith.