Jurisprudential correlation analysis of Razavi's narrative "Al-Nasihah Khashna" with evidences indicating the obligation of enjoining good and forbidding evil.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Secretary and member of the Scientific Council of Razavi University Suspicion Research Center

2 عضو هیئت علمی علوم قرآنی و حدیث، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی

3 razavi uni

Abstract
One of the fundamental duties of Islam is enjoining good and forbidding evil. The appearance of some narrative evidence indicates the necessity of this obligation. On the other hand, there are narrations that list the limitations for the establishment of obligation. Zahir, one of the narrations transmitted by Imam Reza (a.s.) is a guide to the unworthiness of giving advice because it is unfortunate for the audience. This essay is based on a descriptive-analytical method in order to assess the correlation of this hadith with the guiding evidences on the duty of commanding what is good and forbidding what is bad. In order to achieve this goal, the possible reasons for the Imam's refusal to give advice have been highlighted and criticized as follows: the advice is seditious, it is not effective in the audience, the advice is instructive, and the obnoxious action in question is not included in the level of negation. In the last step, with the benefit of the significance analysis of the evidences showing the conditions for the obligation of this obligation in the field of being effective, as well as the guiding traditions on the conditions of effective advice, the selected point of view has been organized. The evaluation of the research is that relying on some historical documents and jurisprudential evidences, it is necessary that the narration is related to things that there is certainty about the ineffectiveness of admonition.

Keywords

Subjects



Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 23 December 2024